Review




Structured Review

Biacore c1 sensor chip
C1 Sensor Chip, supplied by Biacore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/c1 sensor chip/product/Biacore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c1 sensor chip - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

90
Biacore c1 sensor chip
C1 Sensor Chip, supplied by Biacore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/c1 sensor chip/product/Biacore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c1 sensor chip - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biacore series s c1 chip
Series S C1 Chip, supplied by Biacore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/series s c1 chip/product/Biacore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
series s c1 chip - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher neutravidin coated c1 sensor chip
Neutravidin Coated C1 Sensor Chip, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/neutravidin coated c1 sensor chip/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
neutravidin coated c1 sensor chip - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
fluidigm fluidigm c1 chip
Fluidigm C1 Chip, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fluidigm c1 chip/product/fluidigm
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluidigm c1 chip - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Danaher Inc sensor chip c1, series s
Sensor Chip C1, Series S, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sensor chip c1, series s/product/Danaher Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sensor chip c1, series s - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
fluidigm fluidigm c1 chips
Fluidigm C1 Chips, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fluidigm c1 chips/product/fluidigm
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluidigm c1 chips - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Danaher Inc c1 sensor chip
C1 Sensor Chip, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/c1 sensor chip/product/Danaher Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c1 sensor chip - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
fluidigm fluidigm c1 microfluidic chips
Fluidigm C1 Microfluidic Chips, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fluidigm c1 microfluidic chips/product/fluidigm
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluidigm c1 microfluidic chips - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
fluidigm fluidigm c1 microfluidics chips
a) Single cell and barcode beads are co-encapsulated by <t>microfluidics</t> platform. The primers on the barcode beads are equipped with handles for library preparation and single cell barcode and ended with rDS (red) or polyT5C8N (blue), which target both polyA+ and polyA-RNA transcripts. b) Gene-body coverage across all genes based on merged single cells data showing strong 3’ bias for inDrops and mostly uniform with a small 3’ bias for sc-rDSeq. Each gene is divided into 40 segments and counts failing into each segment are calculated for coverage. Ribbon area shows the SEM around mean. c) The boxplot displays nUMI/cell for sc-rDSeq and inDrops. On average, sc-rDSeq captures 90k nUMI/cell, inDrops captures 7.4k nUMI/cell. d) Distribution of uniquely mapped reads in each type of genomic locations with merged single cells data. e) Percentage of genes detected by sc-rDSeq compared to inDrops. f) Histogram showing normalized distribution of the fraction of transcripts per biotype expressed in single cells, comparing sc-rDSeq to inDrops. g) Cost comparison of sc-rDSeq and other single RNA-seq technologies. Top bars (red) for instrument cost, and bottom bars (blue) for library and sequencing cost per cell. h) UMAP of PC9 cells (n = 680) based on total transcriptome, revealing four clusters of populations. i) Differentially expressed genes were identified using KNN unsupervised clustering of total transcriptome expression. The average expression of selected marker genes for each cluster are presented in dot plot. j) Top five GO terms enriched in each cluster, ranked by fold enrichment. k) The average expression of polyA-RNAs showed heterogeneity, including histone RNAs, lncRNAs, sncRNAs, and microRNAs.
Fluidigm C1 Microfluidics Chips, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fluidigm c1 microfluidics chips/product/fluidigm
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fluidigm c1 microfluidics chips - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a) Single cell and barcode beads are co-encapsulated by microfluidics platform. The primers on the barcode beads are equipped with handles for library preparation and single cell barcode and ended with rDS (red) or polyT5C8N (blue), which target both polyA+ and polyA-RNA transcripts. b) Gene-body coverage across all genes based on merged single cells data showing strong 3’ bias for inDrops and mostly uniform with a small 3’ bias for sc-rDSeq. Each gene is divided into 40 segments and counts failing into each segment are calculated for coverage. Ribbon area shows the SEM around mean. c) The boxplot displays nUMI/cell for sc-rDSeq and inDrops. On average, sc-rDSeq captures 90k nUMI/cell, inDrops captures 7.4k nUMI/cell. d) Distribution of uniquely mapped reads in each type of genomic locations with merged single cells data. e) Percentage of genes detected by sc-rDSeq compared to inDrops. f) Histogram showing normalized distribution of the fraction of transcripts per biotype expressed in single cells, comparing sc-rDSeq to inDrops. g) Cost comparison of sc-rDSeq and other single RNA-seq technologies. Top bars (red) for instrument cost, and bottom bars (blue) for library and sequencing cost per cell. h) UMAP of PC9 cells (n = 680) based on total transcriptome, revealing four clusters of populations. i) Differentially expressed genes were identified using KNN unsupervised clustering of total transcriptome expression. The average expression of selected marker genes for each cluster are presented in dot plot. j) Top five GO terms enriched in each cluster, ranked by fold enrichment. k) The average expression of polyA-RNAs showed heterogeneity, including histone RNAs, lncRNAs, sncRNAs, and microRNAs.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Expanding single-cell toolbox with a cost-effective full-length total RNA droplet-based sequencing technology

doi: 10.1101/2025.02.23.639726

Figure Lengend Snippet: a) Single cell and barcode beads are co-encapsulated by microfluidics platform. The primers on the barcode beads are equipped with handles for library preparation and single cell barcode and ended with rDS (red) or polyT5C8N (blue), which target both polyA+ and polyA-RNA transcripts. b) Gene-body coverage across all genes based on merged single cells data showing strong 3’ bias for inDrops and mostly uniform with a small 3’ bias for sc-rDSeq. Each gene is divided into 40 segments and counts failing into each segment are calculated for coverage. Ribbon area shows the SEM around mean. c) The boxplot displays nUMI/cell for sc-rDSeq and inDrops. On average, sc-rDSeq captures 90k nUMI/cell, inDrops captures 7.4k nUMI/cell. d) Distribution of uniquely mapped reads in each type of genomic locations with merged single cells data. e) Percentage of genes detected by sc-rDSeq compared to inDrops. f) Histogram showing normalized distribution of the fraction of transcripts per biotype expressed in single cells, comparing sc-rDSeq to inDrops. g) Cost comparison of sc-rDSeq and other single RNA-seq technologies. Top bars (red) for instrument cost, and bottom bars (blue) for library and sequencing cost per cell. h) UMAP of PC9 cells (n = 680) based on total transcriptome, revealing four clusters of populations. i) Differentially expressed genes were identified using KNN unsupervised clustering of total transcriptome expression. The average expression of selected marker genes for each cluster are presented in dot plot. j) Top five GO terms enriched in each cluster, ranked by fold enrichment. k) The average expression of polyA-RNAs showed heterogeneity, including histone RNAs, lncRNAs, sncRNAs, and microRNAs.

Article Snippet: The single cell isolation is based on Fluidigm C1 microfluidics chips, which has limited throughput, and the method does not incorporate UMIs for PCR deduplication.

Techniques: Comparison, RNA Sequencing, Sequencing, Expressing, Marker